Trump Accounts: Why They’re Not Your Typical College Fund

Last year’s tax legislation (known as the “OBBBA”) introduced a new vehicle to the tax-deferred savings landscape: the “Trump account.” Like 529 college savings plans and custodial accounts held under the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (“UTMA accounts”), Trump accounts offer a way to earmark assets for children. But what problem are these accounts designed to solve?

While early opinions suggested Trump accounts function best as education-funding vehicles, subsequent IRS guidance suggests that saving for retirement is a better use for them.[1] To decide which path to take, examining the tax attributes of each option is crucial. The following analysis aims to demystify these considerations and help families make the most prudent choices for their specific circumstances.

529 Plan Basics

Among the most popular savings vehicles for affluent families, 529 plans are known for their tax efficiency. But this comes with strict constraints on how their funds must be used to avoid triggering substantial income taxes and other penalties. The tax advantages of these vehicles begin at the funding stage, where donors may “superfund” a 529 plan by making up to five years’ worth of annual exclusion gifts in a single lump sum.[2] This lets those assets compound on a tax-deferred basis earlier and for longer time periods. If distributions are channeled toward qualified academic expenses like higher education, limited K-12 tuition, apprenticeships, and certain student loan repayments, those withdrawals are income-tax free. More recently, the SECURE 2.0 Act expanded flexibility by permitting a lifetime transfer of up to $35,000 from a 529 plan to a beneficiary’s Roth IRA, tax- and penalty-free.[3]

An Overview of UTMA Accounts

Parents willing to forego tax efficiency in exchange for flexibility would do well to consider funding UTMA accounts. This empowers donors to transfer assets to minors while retaining custodial oversight until their beneficiaries reach the age of majority, typically at age 18 or 21.

But bear in mind: UTMA accounts come with notable drawbacks. First, investment growth is generally taxable at long-term capital gains rates. Second, once a beneficiary reaches the age of majority, they assume full control of the account. That means families should think long and hard about how much money they trust their young adult offspring to manage.

How Trump Accounts Work

While Trump accounts promote tax-deferred growth, they’re subject to restrictive funding limitations and tax-inefficient withdrawal rules. To truly understand their function, it’s essential to explore two distinct phases: the growth period and the IRA period.

Phase One: The Growth Period

The growth period runs from account creation through December 31 of the year in which the child turns 17. During this period, families and employers may contribute up to $5,000 annually,[4] with inflation adjustments starting in 2027.[5] The federal government will make a one-time $1,000 contribution for children born between 2025 and 2028.

Trump accounts may only hold mutual funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that track US equity indexes. Actively managed portfolios, alternative assets, and volatility-reduction strategies don’t make the cut. What’s more, distributions are prohibited during the growth period, meaning beneficiaries may not access the funds during this phase.

Phase Two: The IRA Period

Beginning January 1 of the year a beneficiary turns 18, a Trump account enters its IRA period. Assets may roll into an IRA established for the child, where standard IRA contributions and investment rules apply—but with caveats. Namely: Trump accounts may not accept SEP or SIMPLE IRA contributions, and they must be tracked separately from other IRA assets. While beneficiaries may continue contributing up to earned‑income and contribution limits, withdrawals are taxed as ordinary income. And, barring exceptions, early distributions taken before age 59½ trigger a 10% penalty.

Should Trump Accounts Be Used for Educational Expenses?

When first introduced, many families wondered whether Trump accounts could efficiently fund education expenses while avoiding an additional 10% penalty. But many failed to realize that these assets are still taxed at ordinary income rates upon withdrawal. The following real-world, apples‑to‑apples comparison illustrates why this distinction matters.

Assume a family contributes $5,000 annually (the maximum permitted contribution to a Trump account) to a 529 plan, an UTMA account, or a Trump account for 17 years. Under these assumptions, a 529 plan grows to approximately $183,100 (Display 1). Because qualified education withdrawals are tax‑free, the full balance is available for financing education. On the other hand, a UTMA account grows to roughly $169,300, but after capital gains taxes, only $159,500 is available for education. Meanwhile, a Trump account grows to $185,800, but only the after‑tax value of approximately $162,200 is available for educational expenses.

The takeaway is clear. When it comes to tax-efficient education funding, families should prioritize 529 plans, followed by UTMA accounts, and finally Trump accounts. Although the last option benefits from tax‑deferred growth, withdrawals are taxed at high ordinary income rates, UTMA accounts benefit from lower capital gains rates, while education-funding 529 plans eliminate income taxation altogether.[6]

For Retirement, Timing Is Everything

When all is said and done, Trump accounts are best evaluated as retirement‑savings tools in most cases, as opposed to education vehicles. A 529 plan’s utility in this context is limited; SECURE 2.0 allows only a $35,000 lifetime rollover to a Roth IRA. Therefore, the relevant comparison is between Trump accounts and UTMA accounts.

Here, timing matters. In early years, the higher ordinary income tax rates imposed on Trump account withdrawals make UTMA accounts more attractive on an after‑tax basis. But over longer horizons, tax‑deferred growth eventually overtakes the drag of ordinary income taxation. After approximately 31 years, a Trump account produces greater after‑tax retirement value than a comparable UTMA account (Displays 2 and 3).[7][8]

The lesson isn’t that Trump accounts are universally superior; it’s that their ideal application is situational. For those with long horizons and clear retirement objectives, Trump accounts can play a limited but meaningful role. However, for many families, relying on this vehicle to fund education or short-term needs is like trying to eat soup with a fork—technically possible, but inefficient and frustrating. In most cases, more familiar and purpose-built tools remain the better fit.

[1] IRS Notice 2025-68.

[2] IRC 529(c)(2)(B).

[3] Assuming that the beneficiary had been a beneficiary of the 529 plan for at least 15 years. SECURE 2.0 Act Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, P.L. 117-328.

[4] Employer contributions are limited to $2,500 per employee per year (indexed for inflation beginning in 2027) and are excluded from the employee’s gross income. Employer contributions are aggregated with contributions from family members and, in aggregate, may not exceed $5,000 annually, also indexed for inflation beginning in 2027.

[5] Current law provides that the $5,000 contribution to a Trump account does not qualify for the annual gift tax exclusion, meaning it counts toward an individual’s lifetime estate tax exclusion.

[6] Note, however, that practitioners expect Trump accounts to be excluded from assets reportable for financial aid qualification, while 529 plan and UTMA account balances are generally included. 

[7] Families may consider converting a Trump account in its IRA period to a Roth IRA. A Trump account fully funded during the growth period would be valued at $185,800. If that amount grows to age 24 to avoid the “kiddie” tax under IRC Section 1(g) and is taxed at the highest ordinary income tax rate of 40.8%, it would produce a tax bill of roughly $119,900 on a median value of $294,000.

[8] For children born between 2025 and 2028 who will receive the $1,000 from the federal government, this crossover point is moved forward to 29 years.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations, do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams and are subject to change over time.

Talk to Us About Your Tax Situation

Connect with our specialists for customized solutions.

Get in touch

Related Insights